http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016RG000534/full
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/06/methane-burps/528654/
Editor post:
What strikes me as amazing – actually really alarming, is the lack of transparency, openness and objectivity on the part of the scientific community who have focused their work on the climate change/global warming issues. The one sided - almost cult level support for the CO2/human caused/fossil fuel warming group is particularly striking.
It
seems so obvious to those of us who are accused of being “deniers” that a
science based examination of climate change/global warming and, more important,
its real potential impact – positive or negative, on the planet and its
inhabitants is an enormously complex scientific undertaking. Most of the
world’s population is standing on the sidelines –not knowing who to believe.
Some of us are earnestly interested in understanding the real science,
the various theories (fossil fuel impact, solar flaring, methane gas, whatever)
and the hard data behind the theories –yet, no one scientific body or group of
scientists seem to be interested in openly examining the merits of all of them.
If
there is one good reason for the U.S.A to pull out of the Paris Accord, it is
obvious that global politics and economic wellbeing – not real science has
driven this initiative.
No comments:
Post a Comment