Sen. Tom Cotton on Wednesday delivered a brilliant speech defending the filibuster as Democrats plot to change Senate rules to pass voting legislation. What made his remarks so powerful? He used the top Senate Democrat’s own words.
“Right now, we are on the precipice of a constitutional crisis. We are about to step into the abyss. I want to talk for a few minutes why we are on that precipice and why we are looking into that abyss,” Cotton said Wednesday, quoting Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
In fact, the rest of the Arkansas Republican’s speech was a reading of Schumer’s previous remarks in which he said changing Senate rules would be “a doomsday for democracy.”
“Let me first ask a fundamental question: What is the crisis that calls for the undoing of two centuries of tradition? … Are … Senators merely doing their jobs as legislators, responding to a generalized public calling for the abolition of the filibuster? Clearly not. It is not the American people at large who are demanding detonation of the nuclear option.
“[T]he nuclear option is being pushed largely by the radioactive rhetoric of a small band of radicals who hold in their hands the political fortunes of the President.
“Constitutional scholars will tell us that the reason we have these rules in the Senate—unlimited debate, two-thirds to change the rules, the idea that 60 have to close off debate—is embodied in the spirit and rule of the Constitution. … That is what the Constitution is all about, and we all know it.
“It is the Senate where the Founding Fathers established a repository of checks and balances. It is not like the House of Representatives where the majority leader or the Speaker can snap his fingers and get what he wants. … On important issues, the Founding Fathers wanted—and they were correct in my judgment—that the slimmest majority should not always govern. … The Senate is not a majoritarian body.
“The bottom line is very simple: the ideologues in the Senate want to turn what the Founding Fathers called the cooling saucer of democracy into the rubber stamp of dictatorship. … They want to make this country into a banana republic where if you don’t get your way, you change the rules! Are we going to let them? It will be a doomsday for democracy if we do.
“I, for one, hope and pray that it will not come to this. But I assure my colleagues, at least speaking for this Senator … I will do everything I can to prevent the nuclear option from being invoked not for the sake of myself or my party but for the sake of this great Republic and its traditions.” (Schumer's words, read by Cotton)
"Senator Schumer spoke so eloquently in defense of the Senate’s rules, customs, and traditions when the fortunes of his party looked a little different," Cotton said when he finished reading the New York Democrat's past speech.
2 comments:
As usual this column is not exactly truthful.
The filibuster in its modern version, the "stealth" filibuster has only been in existence since about 1972 when Congress allowed other business to continue during the filibuster.
The U.S. Constitution doesn’t specifically address the filibuster. Although some of the framers made clear that they supported majority rule—including Alexander Hamilton, who described the minority veto as “a poison” in the Federalist Papers —the Constitution left it up to lawmakers to set the rules that would govern their chambers.
Which gets us to the majority of 81 million citizens who voted to elect President Biden are seeing his policies blocked by representatives of a minority. It may be time to get rid of the "stealth filibuster" - either in its entirety or going back to the original concept where those needing to filibuster have to speak.
Tom,
Please face the facts. "BIDEN IS SEEING HIS POLICIES BLOCKED" NOT JUST BY REPUBLICANS. THEYRE ARE AT LEAST 2 DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE who are blocking his policies. If a President can't get those who elected him to agree with his policies, you can't those who voted against him.
Chuck S
Post a Comment