Wall Street Journal
The
capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.”
That quote, attributed to Lenin, was a colorful
metaphor for what Marxists call the internal contradictions of capitalism.
Belief in the inherent inevitability of the West’s imminent collapse sustained
the Soviet Communists right up to the moment in 1989 when their own system
proved more self-annihilating than anything capitalism could muster.
But the old maxim has taken on a new and more
plausible form today. It was on display last week in the first encounter
between President Biden’s foreign policy team and the modern claimants to
Marxism-Leninism’s primacy in the Chinese Communist Party.
It was evident from the moment the two sides sat
down that an emboldened Chinese leadership understands that the greatest
ideological weapon it now holds in its increasingly existential struggle with
America is the gleeful enthusiasm for self-destruction that characterizes so
much of elite opinion in the U.S.
When Yang Jiechi, the Communist Party’s
foreign-affairs chief, lectured Secretary of State Antony Blinken about
America’s human-rights record, its treatment of minorities and its system’s
innate inequity, everything he said could have been lifted straight from the
pages of the Democratic Party’s presidential election platform, culled from
Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper stories, or jotted down in a student’s notes
from lectures delivered daily at America’s top universities.
In fact, it probably was.
In response, a visibly discomfited Mr. Blinken
mumbled something barely coherent that at least America deals with its problems
in the open. He then complained, like a bested debater, that his opponent had
gone over his allotted time.
The larger truth is that the people who control
America’s leading cultural institutions and now its government have been
eagerly manufacturing ideological rope for the Chinese hangman, and they’ve
stepped up production over the past year.
The intellectual movement to which they subscribe
has been the force behind the planned destruction—figuratively and literally—of
the principal pillars of America’s authority in the world: the idea that the
greatest nation on the planet was founded on universal ideals of human freedom
and dignity. Instead, it insists, like those Chinese Communists, that all along
this claim to a unique status in the world has been a fraud, mere sloganeering
behind which America has been—and remains—a force for repression and
exploitation.
How can a nation prevail in a global ideological
struggle when its leaders believe its values are intrinsically evil?
Mr. Yang and his colleagues must have had a good
laugh on their way back to Beijing. Indeed they are probably chuckling at much
of what they see in the values and principles to which America’s new
masters—sorry, nongendered leadership figures—demand loyalty.
This isn’t about the maternity flight suits for
fighter pilots or updated requirements for Army hairstyles the commander in
chief proudly hailed earlier this month.
It’s about the elevation of victimhood as the
prime signifier of honor in modern America. Whether you’re an opportunistic
young hoodlum looting Gucci or a member of the celebrity plutocracy seeking
better publicity, don the mantle of a hapless innocent exploited by an
inherently unjust system, and you’re golden. It’s hard to imagine a successful
society in which the claim to being the victim of some oppressor—often a
spurious claim—is the quickest route to advancement.
It’s about the destruction of the idea of
academic excellence that now seems to have much of the educational establishment
in its grip. Democrats in control of major cities across the country are busy
eliminating the opportunities for some of their most disadvantaged children
that come from admission to selective schools on the basis of talent. We are
told that’s discriminatory. Leveling down is the result.
And of course it’s in the fanatical insistence on
the qualities that divide rather than unite Americans—race, sexual orientation
and multifarious “gender”—as the principal characteristics of identity. How
bitterly ironic that Marxist theories of structural oppression that were
discredited by the experience of America’s ideological adversaries in the last
century are now rampant in the most influential strata of American society in
this one. Lenin may get the last laugh.
The Chinese have proved much more adept than
their Russian predecessors at adapting the precepts of Marxism to economic
reality. As Lenin predicted, they’ve had plenty of help from American
capitalists in the process.
But our cultural elites have also been busy
exporting the hangman’s rope across the Pacific. At least the capitalists have
been selling it to them. Much of modern America seems intent on giving it away.
No comments:
Post a Comment